5 min

Dealers + Data Privacy Part 2 | Under Attack

On this page

Written by

Seventy five percent of dealers who updated their security policies to meet the FTC’s June 2023 compliance deadline are alreadyseeing vast improvements.
— CDK Global
Data privacy is a critical factor to continued success for dealers in 2023, but a new study from CDK Global reports that 17% of dealersadmitted to having experienced a cyberattack or data security incident in the past year alone. As staggering as that nearly 1-in-5 claimis, the general assumption among data experts is that the real number is much, much higher, with cybercriminals evolving the methodsthey use to steal customer and client data by exploiting vulnerabilities many dealers didn't even know they had. So, what's to be done?We're glad you asked.
In Dealers + Data Privacy Part 1, we discussed using the FTC Safeguards Rule as a prescription to help get your data in order. In thisarticle, we'll look at one tool that can help dealers do that while, at the same time, helping them buy sufficient cyber insurancecoverage to navigate future threats.
Understanding Your Assets
More than 60% of known cybersecurity breaches were fundamentally due to known software vulnerabilities in which a patch wasavailable through a software update, but that the update had not been applied. That's according to a report from Ohio University basedon data collected by the Ponemon Institute — an independent research group dedicated to advancing the responsible use ofconsumer information and data privacy management practices within businesses.
So, why is software not being updated? In dealers across North America, the answer is often as simple as: "We didn't know we hadthat."

"As dealerships get acquired and consolidated, their technology stack can get shuffled around in pretty significant ways," explains DirkShaw, one of the co-founders of SecondSight.ai. "Things can get lost in that shuffle, I.T. departments can experience turnover,contracts can get canceled, etc. and any one of those scenarios can lead to an update being missed."That's one of the reasons we recommend SecondSight to auto dealers. "This solution was developed, first and foremost, to helpbusinesses obtain cyber insurance coverage," explains Tim Hayden, CEO of Brain+Trust. "As we learned more about the tool, werealized that SecondSight's Digital Asset Inventory, Risk Scoring, and 'always-on' vulnerability monitoring features could be of greatvalue to dealerships and other "financial institutions" months after using the software for its originally intended, for obtaining cybercoverage.

"The Digital Asset Inventory feature of SecondSight monitors all of a dealership's digital assets, all the digital tools and platforms it'susing, from a single workbench, enabling the dealer principal or GM to delegate responsibility for each asset to a specific person at thestore (for example: payroll software to the HR manager, social media apps to the internet manager, etc.), making the store'stechnology stack more manageable on a day-to-day basis while automagically creating a "virtual binder" to make migrating from oneI.T. manager (or contractor) to another a smooth operation.

"The auto industry had a 46% staff turnover in 2022, and 2023 won't be much better. That's why any tool that can help manage dataaccess and easily transition management to new I.T. staff is worth its weight," offers Tim. "And, of course, having adequate cybercoverage is more important than ever.

"By The (Scary) Numbers

"Data theft and extortion has skyrocketed in the past four years," reads the CDK Global report titled 'DRIVING INTO DANGER: CDKGLOBAL 2023 CYBERSECURITY REPORT REVEALS RISE IN AUTO DEALERSHIP CYBERATTACKS'. That same report claimsthat the average cybercriminal's financial payout dramatically increased from "just" $44,000 in 2019 to a whopping $740,144 in 2023— and the dealers are scrambling, both to secure their customer information and obtain cyber insurance coverage, as well.

"Unfortunately, it is no longer a matter of 'if' but 'when' a cyber breach arises (at a dealership)," explains David LaGreca, senior vicepresident and general manager of IT Solutions at CDK Global. "Having the necessary preventative measures in place, along with atrusted partner to manage I.T. infrastructure, can help minimize a dealership's [financial] impact when an attack does occur.

"It's Not All Bad News

Instead of looking at FTC compliance as an obstacle to overcome and focusing on the negative aspects of cyber-attacks, rememberthat a proactive approach towards FTC Safeguards Rule compliance can result in more confident operations and compliance,providing direction for data management such as CDPs and artificial intelligence, better data governance leading to more impactfulmarketing success campaigns, reduced customer acquisition costs, and ultimately sales growth. As we said in Dealers + Data PrivacyPart 1, data regulations are a prescription for getting your data in order, enabling you to more fully understand the true lifetime value ofyour customers, build more trust, and increase sales.

Click here to find out more about how Brain+Trust leverages tools like SecondSight to help your dealership secure the best possiblecyber insurance coverage, and come back for Part 3, where we'll look at some of the ways the best CDPs can help your dealershipimprove both fixed and variable operations and dramatically increase your return on ad spend.

ORIGINAL CONTENT FROM BRAIN+TRUST.

What the team
is writing

Strategy, execution, and lessons from the field

Is my data secure?

Why do most AI proofs of concept fail to scale?

Proof of concept projects are built to answer one question: can this be done? They're not designed to address the harder questions about integration, ownership, governance, and operational fit. When the proof of concept ends, organizations typically lack the infrastructure—unified data, real-time orchestration, clear ownership—needed to move to production. Without this foundation, scaling becomes prohibitively expensive and complex.

Why do most AI proofs of concept fail to scale?

Proof of concept projects are built to answer one question: can this be done? They're not designed to address the harder questions about integration, ownership, governance, and operational fit. When the proof of concept ends, organizations typically lack the infrastructure—unified data, real-time orchestration, clear ownership—needed to move to production. Without this foundation, scaling becomes prohibitively expensive and complex.

Why do most AI proofs of concept fail to scale?

Proof of concept projects are built to answer one question: can this be done? They're not designed to address the harder questions about integration, ownership, governance, and operational fit. When the proof of concept ends, organizations typically lack the infrastructure—unified data, real-time orchestration, clear ownership—needed to move to production. Without this foundation, scaling becomes prohibitively expensive and complex.

Why do most AI proofs of concept fail to scale?

Proof of concept projects are built to answer one question: can this be done? They're not designed to address the harder questions about integration, ownership, governance, and operational fit. When the proof of concept ends, organizations typically lack the infrastructure—unified data, real-time orchestration, clear ownership—needed to move to production. Without this foundation, scaling becomes prohibitively expensive and complex.

+

Have more question?

Ask Question

Not sure where
to start?

The AI and Future Readiness Assessment identifies your current state across operations, data, and AI readiness and maps the highest-priority opportunities